We asked, you said, we did


Below you can read about how we are using the results from consultations to help inform decisions.


Below you can read about how we are using the results from consultations to help inform decisions.

  • Disabled Persons Freedom Pass Consultation

    about 1 year ago

    We Asked

    We asked for your views on the evidence we proposed to accept to support a Disabled Persons Freedom Pass application and the ways you can apply for a Disabled Persons Freedom Pass.

    You Said

    We considered 376 responses received from a mix of service users, residents of Barnet and statutory stakeholders and people who work with service users including:

    • Disabled Persons Freedom Pass holders
    • older Persons Freedom Pass holders
    • residents interested in applying for a Freedom Pass
    • relatives of Disabled Persons Freedom Pass holders
    • those whose job involves working with Freedom Pass users in Barnet
    • Barnet residents interested...

    We Asked

    We asked for your views on the evidence we proposed to accept to support a Disabled Persons Freedom Pass application and the ways you can apply for a Disabled Persons Freedom Pass.

    You Said

    We considered 376 responses received from a mix of service users, residents of Barnet and statutory stakeholders and people who work with service users including:

    • Disabled Persons Freedom Pass holders
    • older Persons Freedom Pass holders
    • residents interested in applying for a Freedom Pass
    • relatives of Disabled Persons Freedom Pass holders
    • those whose job involves working with Freedom Pass users in Barnet
    • Barnet residents interested in Disabled Persons Freedom Passes
    • voluntary/community organisations
    • public sector organisations

    73% of respondents (238 out of 376) advised they currently hold a Disabled Persons Freedom Pass.

    Overall, 53% of the respondents agreed with the changes to the accepted criteria.

    We Did

    At the Policy and Resources meeting on 1 December 2016 it was agreed to adopt the new criteria for assessing eligibility for Disabled Persons Freedom Pass applicants.

    In response to requests for GP letters to be accepted as evidence, this is adopted within the criteria where it is deemed appropriate by the Department for Transport. In some categories this cannot be accepted as evidence because of the risk of compromising the doctor/patient relationship.

    Full details of the December committee report (item 12) can be found here.


  • Proposal to Expand Childs Hill Primary School

    about 1 year ago

    We Asked

    We asked how you felt about the proposal to expand Childs Hill Primary School from one and a half to two forms of entry (45 children per year group to 60 children per year group), in order to meet demand for school places in the surrounding area. The proposal explained that the expansion would be gradual, with the first intake of 60 pupils beginning in Reception for September 2016.

    You Said

    The survey for the school’s expansion showed that four out of six respondents supported the proposal (of which three strongly supported the proposal). A further respondent neither...

    We Asked

    We asked how you felt about the proposal to expand Childs Hill Primary School from one and a half to two forms of entry (45 children per year group to 60 children per year group), in order to meet demand for school places in the surrounding area. The proposal explained that the expansion would be gradual, with the first intake of 60 pupils beginning in Reception for September 2016.

    You Said

    The survey for the school’s expansion showed that four out of six respondents supported the proposal (of which three strongly supported the proposal). A further respondent neither supported nor opposed the proposal, and one respondent strongly opposed the proposal. Two respondents raised concerns around the impact of increased traffic on air quality and parking. The governing body considered the responses and was satisfied that these concerns could be managed, and proceeded to the representation stage, which involved publishing a statutory notice. One representation was received during the representation period from Camden Council, which had no further comments or any objections to the proposed expansion.

    We Did

    The governing body of the school and the council considered the responses to both the initial consultation and the representation period and is recommending the expansion of Childs Hill Primary School, to come into effect on 1 September 2016. The school is committed to sustainable transport initiatives, securing TfL’s bronze sustainable travel accreditation annually since 2011, and has applied for gold accreditation this year.


  • 30 Hours Free Early Education - Parents' Questionnaire

    about 1 year ago

    We Asked

    We asked parents with children aged four or under about their current and future use of childcare provision. We wanted to know this in order to better understand the future demand for the additional 15 hours of free childcare to be introduced in September 2017, for 3 and 4 year olds.

    The consultation ran from the 22 February 2017 – 5 April 2017 with an online questionnaire (anonymous responses) being available during this period on the council’s Engage Barnet website available to all stakeholders. A document with information on the 30 hours of free...

    We Asked

    We asked parents with children aged four or under about their current and future use of childcare provision. We wanted to know this in order to better understand the future demand for the additional 15 hours of free childcare to be introduced in September 2017, for 3 and 4 year olds.

    The consultation ran from the 22 February 2017 – 5 April 2017 with an online questionnaire (anonymous responses) being available during this period on the council’s Engage Barnet website available to all stakeholders. A document with information on the 30 hours of free childcare and eligibility criteria for parents to qualify for the additional 15 hours was available.

    You Said

    Overall we received 49 responses.

    Of these, 78% had accessed some form of childcare in the past 6 months. The majority that answered questions on their current childcare answered that: their child attends a nursery school, playgroup or pre-school; they currently receive free childcare and their child(ren) attend for 8-14 or 15-20 hours a week; they pay for childcare from Monday to Friday, paying more than £161 a week and that it was easy for them to find a childcare provider at suitable times and dates.

    Of the 7 parents that answered a question on if they plan to access formal (i.e. nursery) childcare in the next 18 months, 6 agreed they would.

    Most parents said it was very likely that they would use the additional 15 hours of childcare if these were available now and most would access 11-15 hours of this a week. Most would switch to another provider to access this if their current provider couldn’t offer the additional hours, but would only use one provider for all their children.

    Most respondents were currently in work and had a partner in work. Most agreed that the additional 15 hours of childcare would benefit them to increase their working hours and reduce the cost of childcare to their household.

    We Did

    The results of the consultation were presented to a 30 Hour Working Party on 19 April 2017 in order to plan future provision. This party included representatives from across the Early Years sector in Barnet, including nursery and daycare managers and reception teachers.

  • Proposal for the future of library provision in East Barnet and New Barnet

    about 1 year ago

    We Asked

    We asked residents for their views on the proposal to relocate the library in East Barnet to the proposed future leisure centre at the Victoria Recreation Ground in New Barnet. In particular, residents were asked:

    • whether they tended to agree or disagree with the proposal
    • how likely they would be to use the library should it be located within the proposed new leisure centre
    • for reasons why the would/would not be likely to use the library in the proposed new location.

    In order to enable further understanding of individual responses, open ended questions were included inviting respondents to...

    We Asked

    We asked residents for their views on the proposal to relocate the library in East Barnet to the proposed future leisure centre at the Victoria Recreation Ground in New Barnet. In particular, residents were asked:

    • whether they tended to agree or disagree with the proposal
    • how likely they would be to use the library should it be located within the proposed new leisure centre
    • for reasons why the would/would not be likely to use the library in the proposed new location.

    In order to enable further understanding of individual responses, open ended questions were included inviting respondents to give their reasons in addition to questions establishing the respondents use of the current library in East Barnet. Key demographic questions were included at the end to help understand the views of different demographic groups.

    You Said

    Analysis of the questionnaire responses demonstrated that just under half of residents supported the opportunity whilst others, generally those who currently walked to the current library building, were less supportive of the proposal. Twenty three individuals agreed with the proposal to re-locate and re-provide the library and 26 preferred for the library to remain in its current location and building. Three did not know. Respondents who welcomed the proposal generally cited improved location for themselves or their families to make use of the library services, and the benefits to them and other residents of co-locating multiple services on one site. Respondents who preferred for the library to remain in its current location and building most commonly cited proximity of the current library building to their home as the reason.

    The reaction of residents at the face-to-face drop-in sessions also varied although having had an opportunity to see the plans and talk to officers about the potential opportunities for co-locating services, many appreciated the advantages associated with the relocation and some were excited by the opportunity to undertake numerous activities at one venue in the future. More than half of comments made at the drop-in sessions were in favour of the proposal.

    We Did

    Following the 8 week consultation period a report was taken to the Policy and Resources Committee recommending the proposal to re-provide the Partnership library in East Barnet as part of the proposed new leisure facilities in the Victoria Recreation Ground, due to be completed in 2019. This recommendation took into consideration the outcome of the consultation and was made in view of the opportunity to provide modern, fit for purpose library facilities co-located with other leisure and café services (with increased footfall) together with the declining use of the current library in East Barnet and the age and condition of the current building. The Policy and Resources Committee approved the recommendation and subsequently the proposed leisure facility at the Victoria Recreation Ground was granted planning consent.

  • North Central London’s Sustainability and Transformation Plan consultation

    about 1 year ago

    We asked

    We asked for your views on the North Central London (NCL) – which represents Camden, Haringey, Islington, Barnet and Enfield – draft Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP) to NHS England.

    You said

    One response was received which overall neither agreed or disagreed with the plan / proposals.

    The respondent felt that the approach to prevention, social care, planned care and cancer were positive but raised the following concerns:

    • more clarity and information required regarding the plans
    • excuse for cutting access to high quality hospital services
    • physical illnesses...

    We asked

    We asked for your views on the North Central London (NCL) – which represents Camden, Haringey, Islington, Barnet and Enfield – draft Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP) to NHS England.

    You said

    One response was received which overall neither agreed or disagreed with the plan / proposals.

    The respondent felt that the approach to prevention, social care, planned care and cancer were positive but raised the following concerns:

    • more clarity and information required regarding the plans
    • excuse for cutting access to high quality hospital services
    • physical illnesses should be prioritised
    • stressed the importance of high quality well managed a&e in a hospital environment
    • many people do not want services provided digitally, this is especially difficult for older people and people with sensory impairments
    • would have liked to have seen information about plans to stop providing services to people from overseas who are not entitled.

    We did

    The consultation comments, alongside feedback from consultation from other NCL boroughs, has been fed into the NCL STP process and will be considered for the next iteration of the plan.

    More information about the NCL STP, including further iterations of the plan, can be found here.

    The Health and Wellbeing Board will continue to receive reports regarding the NCL STP plan and process; papers and minutes can be viewed here.

  • The Great Weight Debate

    about 1 year ago

    Feedback Updated 05 June 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on childhood obesity.

    You said

    In total there were 160 survey responses from Barnet residents. The availability of cheap unhealthy food was the primary concern across all London boroughs including Barnet. Secondary concerns for respondents from Barnet were the quantity of fast food shops, food advertising, and the time and skills required for healthy food preparation. 65% of Barnet participants felt that the availability of cheap unhealthy food and drink was a main contributing factor to unhealthy lifestyles. Respondents from Barnet...

    Feedback Updated 05 June 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on childhood obesity.

    You said

    In total there were 160 survey responses from Barnet residents. The availability of cheap unhealthy food was the primary concern across all London boroughs including Barnet. Secondary concerns for respondents from Barnet were the quantity of fast food shops, food advertising, and the time and skills required for healthy food preparation. 65% of Barnet participants felt that the availability of cheap unhealthy food and drink was a main contributing factor to unhealthy lifestyles. Respondents from Barnet felt that a more effective intervention would target the availability of unhealthy food & drinks overall, rather than fast-food shops alone. Compared to healthy eating concerns, participants across London felt that there were already interventions in place to help children be physically active. Only 12% of Barnet respondents were unaware of opportunities in their area - an insignificant difference from the London average.

    We did:

    Information gathered from this debate and debates across other boroughs in London will provide a picture of Londoners' opinions on how to best shape interventions on tackling the childhood obesity epidemic. The views and ideas put forward will be used to inform the next stage of the debate with Healthy London Partnership which will work towards making tangible changes at a community and London-wide level. In addition the information gathered will help the Barnet Public Health team to develop a strategy to meet the obesity related needs of children and young people living in Barnet.



  • Burnt Oak Town Centre Project

    about 1 year ago

    Feedback Updated 26 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on our Burnt Oak Town Centre Strategy.

    The strategy identified numerous key proposals to meet the strategy aims. The majority of these proposals were public realm enhancements and building upgrades (shop front improvements), but also included potential development sites and highway improvements. The suggested improvements included works to the local Library, Church, introduction of a railway bridge mural, shop front improvements and a new modern kiosk shop outside the train station.

    You said

    The feedback from our consultation highlighted two themes:

    1) The urgency to start the works...

    Feedback Updated 26 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on our Burnt Oak Town Centre Strategy.

    The strategy identified numerous key proposals to meet the strategy aims. The majority of these proposals were public realm enhancements and building upgrades (shop front improvements), but also included potential development sites and highway improvements. The suggested improvements included works to the local Library, Church, introduction of a railway bridge mural, shop front improvements and a new modern kiosk shop outside the train station.

    You said

    The feedback from our consultation highlighted two themes:

    1) The urgency to start the works as soon as possible

    2) What is the strategy if business/shop owners do not want to engage in the improvements?

    We did

    We are happy to confirm that the on site works have already commenced and are due for completion this summer (2017).

    We created the strategy and engaged with the shop owners in a way to get the best possible response. If shop owners do not want to engage in the improvements then we can not force them to do so. The shop owners are responsible for the upkeep and cleanliness of their shops. However, we are hoping the increase in footfall (the number of shoppers entering a shop or shopping area) and improvements to other shops in the area and will encourage more retail owners to keep their front of shop clean and tidy.


  • Finchley Central Draft Town Centre Strategy

    about 1 year ago

    Feedback Updated 25 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on our Finchley Church End Town Centre Strategy.

    The strategy identified several key proposals which ranged from improving and establishing civic spaces to improving pedestrian and cycling movement through a revised key junction.

    The consultation was carried out on the 30th November 2016 and involved an evening exposition at the Wohl Centre in Finchley Church End with the architects, LBB and large printed copies of the strategy for people to read. The session was a great success with over 100 locals attending to let their opinions known...

    Feedback Updated 25 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on our Finchley Church End Town Centre Strategy.

    The strategy identified several key proposals which ranged from improving and establishing civic spaces to improving pedestrian and cycling movement through a revised key junction.

    The consultation was carried out on the 30th November 2016 and involved an evening exposition at the Wohl Centre in Finchley Church End with the architects, LBB and large printed copies of the strategy for people to read. The session was a great success with over 100 locals attending to let their opinions known and a large number of people completing the online survey.

    You said

    The opinions were fairly varied and diverse, bringing into consideration all of the different elements of the strategy. However there were certain elements of the strategy that had an overwhelming response from multiple respondents.

    A lot of respondents agreed that there was a real issue with the lack of parking in the local area and thought the idea of more development in the area would make this issue a lot worse than it already is.

    There was a mismatch of opinions when it game to potential junction changes and the introduction of cycle lanes through key junctions and roads throughout Church End. A lot of people agreed with the proposed cycle lanes as the current roads are not suitable/safe for cyclists. However, the introduction of cycle lanes mean narrower lanes/less lanes for traffic which many people frowned upon due to the high level of traffic currently.

    We did

    All of the feedback from the consultation evening was considered, resulting in many of the respondent’s issues and comments being added into the revised strategy

    With regards to parking, a full parking study will need to be undertaken prior to the redevelopment of the station car park and other public realm enhancements. Where there is a demand, parking will be reprovided.

    The strategy proposes that the junctions and carriageway along Ballards Lane should be remodelled to prioritise creating wider pavements and cycling lanes. A comprehensive traffic modelling study needs to be carried out to ensure a positive outcome for all users of the town centre.


  • Stonegrove Park: Junior play area refurbishment consultation

    about 1 year ago

    Feedback Updated 25 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on the proposed refurbishment designs for Stonegrove junior play area. Two designs were proposed in the consultation. Design one included the retention of an existing skate unit. Design two proposed the removal of this unit and an increase in size of a new slide unit, as well as the relocation of the fence line to include all of the play area and equipment.

    You said

    There were 84 survey responses to the consultation. Of these;

    • 79% wanted design 2.
    • 91% agreed with the relocation of the fence line...

    Feedback Updated 25 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on the proposed refurbishment designs for Stonegrove junior play area. Two designs were proposed in the consultation. Design one included the retention of an existing skate unit. Design two proposed the removal of this unit and an increase in size of a new slide unit, as well as the relocation of the fence line to include all of the play area and equipment.

    You said

    There were 84 survey responses to the consultation. Of these;

    • 79% wanted design 2.
    • 91% agreed with the relocation of the fence line to include all of the play area and equipment.

    We did

    As a result of the consultation we will be proceeding with design two. The current skate unit will be removed and the fence line will be relocated as part of the Summer 2017 refurbishment.


  • Draft Fit & Active Barnet Framework 2016-2021 consultation

    about 1 year ago

    Feedback updated 22 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on the proposed vision, outcomes and commitments of the draft Fit & Active Barnet Framework (2016-2021).

    You said

    A total of sixty responses were received with representation across residents and organisations that have an interest, involvement or influence over sport and physical activity opportunities in the borough. 75% of respondents agreed / tended to agree with the content of the draft Framework and 8% disagreed / tended to disagree. All comments received were reviewed by the Sport & Physical Activity team.

    We did

    ...

    Feedback updated 22 May 2017

    We asked

    We asked for your views on the proposed vision, outcomes and commitments of the draft Fit & Active Barnet Framework (2016-2021).

    You said

    A total of sixty responses were received with representation across residents and organisations that have an interest, involvement or influence over sport and physical activity opportunities in the borough. 75% of respondents agreed / tended to agree with the content of the draft Framework and 8% disagreed / tended to disagree. All comments received were reviewed by the Sport & Physical Activity team.

    We did

    As a result of the comments received, amendments were made to the draft Framework. A final Fit & Active Barnet Framework (2016-2021) can be found here.